The Temporal Music Cognition of Crosby, Stills and Nash: CATHEDRAL. Verses=grace, choruses=comfort. Average tempo=80 bpm, an indicator of LONELINESS.

“I’m Flying In Winchester Cathedral, all religion has to have its day!” – CATHEDRAL – Crosby, Stills & Nash – Tempo, Meanspeed-Carlton Charts


The song Cathedral by Crosby, Stills, and Nash presents a mysterious tempo irony.

“Suite: Judy Blue-Eyes,” a song about the real life singer Judy Collins, was a rare instance in which multi-sectional tempo format was used by Crosby Stills and nash. multi-rhythmic? Of course – this is common and necessary. But multi-tempo: very rare indeed. You have to think: American Pie by Don McClean (“A LONG LONG TIME AGO/ICAN STILL REMEMBER WHEN THAT MUSIC USED TO MAKE ME SMILE”), Bohemian Rhapsody by Queen (“MAMA JUST KILLED A MAN/PUT A GUN AGAINST HIS HEAD”) or Layla (“LAYLA, LAYLA, YOU GOT ME ON MY KNEES/LAYLA, I’M BEGGING YOU DARLING PLEASE!”) by Derek and the Dominoes (Eric Clapton’s solo Layla has one tempo range only). Years later on the album called simply ‘contemporary pop music. Music of this era that took on more than one tempo section was known as “progressive rock” or “symphonic rock,” featuring bands as Yes, Emerson, & Palmer, and early Genesis. CSN,’ “Cathedral” is similarly set it two tempo sections.

I measured tempo in 10-beat contiguous intervals, and the slower sections of the songs are in the meanspeed ranges in the area of Grace (70-76 beats per minute), where at times the tempo dips into the ceremony range, 63-69 beats per minute. During the fast sections, the speed range of Comfort, 98-105 beats per minute.

When the entire song is averaged, though, the average tempo is precisely 80 beats per minute, which the meanspeed conjecture predicts will emote Loneliness (79-84 beats per minute). This certainly did not seem to fit the theory!

altar high is a wonderfully wonderful concept, but, ultimately the band sings “TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED IN THE NAME OF CHRIST FOR ANYONE TO HEED THE CALL. SO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED IN THE NAME OF CHRIST THAT I CAN’T BELIEVE IT ALL!” In other words, we have a Crosby, Stills, and Nash protest song against the use of religion as an excuse for war. In a futile attempt to end war by singing a Side 2 unknown pop song is sort of a futile thing to do, it is lonely, and therefore in that way the overall speed fits the conjecture. It is up to the listener to decide that one. I buy my own rationalization – but it is not for me to Then I thought about the lyrics again, knowing that the song was written from a real experience the men had upon a visit to Winchester Cathedral. The lyrics say: the church is beautiful, tehmeanspeeddecide the bright line rule!

The double irony here is that when Crosby, Stills, and Nash played with Neil Young under Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, two protest songs were notable: “Southern Man, ” which spurred the song “Sweet Home Alabama,” in which the bands reminds us with a loud lonely anger to practice what you preach, “SOUTHERN MAN, BETTER KEEP YOUR HEAD/DON’T FORGET WHAT YOUR GOOD BOOK SAID/SOUTHERN CHANGE GONNA/COME AT LAST/NOW YOUR CROSSES ARE BURNING FAST. HEY! SOUTHERN MAN” and “Ohio,” a song written in 1970 immediately after Neil Young heard about 4 students being shot and killed by local police at Ohio State University during a Viet Nam [undeclared] war protest, “TIN SOLDIERS AND NIXON’S COMING/THIS SUMMER WE’RE ON OUR OWN/THIS SUMMER I HEAR THE DRUMMING/FOUR DEAD IN OHIO. FOUR DEAD IN OHIO!” Both of *these* protest songs are indeed found in the meanspeed conjecture range of Loneliness.
I invite Neil Young for a coffee to discuss this.

Meanpeed-Carlton Summary
song title=Cathedral
performer=Crosby, Stills & Nash
composer=Graham Nash
album=CSN
key=C# minor
average tempo=80 beats per minute
average beat measurement=750 milliseconds
meanspeed music conjecture emotive category=Loneliness (79-84 beats per minute)

Ian Andrew Schneider
July 9, 2008

MUSIC COGNITION: So many Ph.D’s, so little useful insight. One must wonder where these people get their money from.

Music cognition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Music cognition is an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the mental processes that support musical behaviors, including perception, comprehension, memory, attention, and performance. Originally arising in fields of psychoacoustics and sensation, cognitive theories of how people understand music more recently encompass neuroscience, music theory, computer science, philosophy, and linguistics.

Contents

[hide]

//

[edit] Overview

Music cognition clearly came to be recognized as a discipline in the early 1980s, with the creation of the Society for Music Perception and Cognition, European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, and the journal Music Perception. The field of music cognition focuses on how the mind makes sense of music as it is heard. It also deals with the related question of the cognitive processes involved when musicians perform music. Like language, music is a uniquely human capacity that arguably played a central role in the origins of human cognition. The ways in which music can illuminate fundamental issues in cognition have been underexamined, or even dismissed as epiphenomenal. However, cognition in music is more and more acknowledged as fundamental to our understanding of cognition as a whole, hence music cognition should be able to contribute both conceptually and methodologically to cognitive science. Topics in the field include the following and others:

  • A listener’s perception of grouping structure (motives, phrases, sections, etc.)
  • Rhythm and meter (perception and production)
  • Key inference
  • Expectation (including melodic expectation).
  • Musical similarity
  • Emotional, affective, or arousal response
  • Expressive, musical performance

Some aspects of cognitive music theory describe how sound is perceived by a listener. While the study of human interpretations of sound is called psychoacoustics, the cognitive aspects of how listeners interpret sounds as musical events is commonly known as music cognition.

In the 1970s, music was studied in the sciences mainly for its acoustical and perceptual properties, in what were then relatively novel disciplines such as psychophysics and music psychology. Music scholars criticized much of this research for focusing too much on low-level issues of sensation and perception, often using impoverished stimuli (e.g., small rhythmic fragments) or music restricted to the Western classical repertoire, as well as a general unawareness of the role of music in its wider social and cultural context. However, the cognitive revolution made scientists more aware of the role and importance of these aspects. While twenty years ago, music was hardly mentioned in any handbook of psychology (or appeared only in a subsection on pitch or rhythm perception), it is now recognized, along with vision and language, as an important and informative domain in which to study a variety of aspects of cognition, including expectation, emotion, perception, and memory. The role of music scholars and scientists in this research seems to be greater than ever. It could well be that music cognition will evolve into a prominent discipline contributing to our understanding of cognition as a whole.

[edit] See also

[edit] Bibliography

[edit] Introductory Reading

[edit] Intermediate Reading

  • Deutsch, D. (Ed.) (1999). “The Psychology of Music, 2nd Edition”. The Psychology of Music, 2nd Edition. ISBN 0-12-213565-2.
  • Dowling, W. Jay and Harwood, Dane L. (1986) Music Cognition. San Diego: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-221430-7.
  • Krumhansl, Carol L. (2001) Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-514836-3.
  • Parncutt, Richard (1989). Harmony: A Psychoacoustical Approach. Berlin: Springer.
  • Sloboda, John A. (1985) The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-852128-6.
  • Lerdahl, F., and Jackendoff, R. (1996) A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262621076.
  • Temperley, D. (2004) The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262701051.
  • Zbikowski, Lawrence M., (2004) Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0195140231.

[edit] Journal Articles

[edit] External links